Breaking down barriers for prescribing and using hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms: an experts' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Around 80% of women suffer menopause-related symptoms that affect their daily activities and quality of life. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has proven to be beneficial in relieving these symptoms. Nevertheless, only 20/30% of symptomatic women seek treatment. This has resulted in neglect of a generation of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) education in menopausal medicine and a reduction in the prescription of MHT in menopausal women for over two decades. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this article was to identify the main barriers that HCPs face for prescribing MHT and menopausal women for using it. Six European experts in menopause agreed on the profiles of women that benefit from MHT and proposed strategies to break down these barriers. EXPERT OPINION: The most important barrier for HCPs was deficient knowledge of the true evidence-based information, with inadequate training regarding the efficacy and safety of personalized MHT and the real benefit/risk ratio in the treatment of symptomatic women. For patients, fear of developing breast cancer was identified as the single most important barrier. Breaking down barriers is possible, by providing appropriate training and education to HCPs and women. This should result in fully informed, evidence based, shared treatment decisions by women and their physicians.

Oral Progestins in Hormonal Contraception: Importance and Future Perspectives of a New Progestin Only-Pill Containing 4 mg Drospirenone.

Hormonal contraceptives are an effective and safe method for preventing pregnancy. Progestins used in contraception are either components of combined hormonal contraceptives (tablets, patches or vaginal rings) or are used as a single active ingredient in progestin mono-preparations (the progestin-only pill (POP), implants, intrauterine systems or depot preparations). Progestins are highly effective in long-term contraception when used properly, and have a very good safety profile with very few contraindications. A new oestrogen-free ovulation inhibitor (POP) has recently been authorised in the USA and the EU. This progestin mono-preparation contains 4 mg of drospirenone (DRSP), which has anti-gonadotropic, anti-mineralocorticoidic and anti-androgenic properties. The hormone administration regimen of 24 days followed by a 4-day hormone-free period was chosen to improve bleeding control and to maintain oestradiol concentrations at early follicular-phase levels, preventing oestrogen deficiency. Clinical trials have demonstrated a high contraceptive effectiveness, a very low risk of cardiovascular side effects and a favourable menstrual bleeding pattern. Due to the long half-life of DRSP (30 - 34 hours), the effectiveness of the preparation is maintained even if a woman forgets to take a pill on a single occasion. Studies involving deliberate 24-hour delays in taking a pill have demonstrated that ovulation inhibition is maintained if a single pill is missed. Following a summary of the current status of oestrogen-free contraception, this review article will describe the clinical development programme of the 4 mg DRSP mono-preparation and the resulting data on the effectiveness and safety of this new oestrogen-free oral hormonal contraceptive.

Correction: Oral Progestins in Hormonal Contraception: Importance and Future Perspectives of a New Progestin Only-Pill Containing 4 mg Drospirenone.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1471-4408.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1471-4408.].

Extended-cycle versus conventional treatment with a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (30 µg) and levonorgestrel (150 µg) in a randomized controlled trial.

The objective was to assess efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) in an extended-cycle vs. a conventional-cycle regimen. This first European randomized, active controlled, open, prospective, parallel-group trial was conducted in 48 German gynecological centers. 1,314 healthy, sexually active women aged 18-35 years were randomized. With an unadjusted PI of 0.483 (upper 95% CI: 1.237), the extended-cycle regimen fulfilled the contraceptive efficacy of EE/LNG, the requirements of the European Medicines Agency. The mean total number of bleeding days per year was significantly lower in the extended-cycle vs. the conventional-cycle regimen. Analyses of bleeding patterns showed a reduced total number of bleeding/spotting days per year in the extended-cycle vs. the conventional-cycle regimen. Cycle-associated complaints and AE were comparable in both groups. Both regimens were very well accepted. The extended-cycle regimen of EE/LNG was effective and well tolerated resulting in a lower number of bleeding days and a favorable bleeding pattern compared to the conventional-cycle regimen.

Hormone therapy for first-line management of menopausal symptoms: Practical recommendations.

Hormone therapy use has undergone dramatic changes over the past 20 years. Widespread use of hormone therapy in the 1980s and 1990s came to an abrupt halt in the early 2000s after initial findings of the Women's Health Initiative trial were published and the study was terminated. Since then, much has been learned about the characteristics of women most likely to benefit from hormone therapy. There is general agreement that women younger than 60 years or who initiate hormone therapy within 10 years of menopause onset gain short-term benefit in terms of symptomatic relief and long-term benefit in terms of protection from chronic diseases that affect postmenopausal women. Despite accumulating evidence in support of hormone therapy for symptomatic menopausal women, the slow response by the medical community has led to a 'large and unnecessary burden of suffering' by women worldwide. Greater efforts are clearly needed to educate physicians and medical students about the pathophysiology of menopause and the role of hormone therapy in supporting women through the transition. This article provides a brief historical perspective of events that led to the backlash against hormone therapy, explores the current position of guideline groups, and provides practical recommendations to guide first-line management of symptomatic menopausal women.